A
comparative study of osteopaths’ and general practitioners’ views
regarding contemporary osteopathic issues in the UK
Robert S.
Flitman
Supervisor: Simon Chafer
Abstract
The intention of this
ostensibly quantitative research has been to identify both similarities and
discrepancies in the understanding of GPs’ attitudes and perceptions, as
well as those of osteopaths, in order to debunk certain accepted wisdoms.
To fit this
purpose, two interdependent questionnaires were developed in consultation
with practicing osteopaths and GPs for issue to two random populations of
100 practising osteopaths and 100 GPs.
Following
their receipt and data analysis four philosophical themes were developed for
discussion. Namely, referrals, the NHS, pharmaceutical interventions and
education, evidence base and research.
Results do
suggest that osteopaths may underestimate the esteem GPs have for the
knowledge and skills of osteopathy. This may be viewed as a very positive
thing and may be an indicator of the health of the UK osteopathic profession
and good prospects for inter-practitioner cooperation.